PNAC went on record in August 2000 for wanting a “catastrophic, catalyzing event- a new Pearl Harbor to so enrage Americans and make possible their agenda to make the USA the undisputed superpower in the 21st century.

Even a rookie detective will tell you that motive and means are the keys to identifying suspects in a crime. The self-proclaimed goals of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) clearly establish a more realistic and plausible motive to create a “new Pearl Harbor” than can be attributed to any Islamic extremist. As a matter of fact, the events of 9/11 were perhaps the most counterproductive factors in the history of Islamic progress. They resulted in an overwhelming backlash against the many Islamic people around the world.

The PNAC agenda came off the shelf the day GW Bush took power as President.

The members of the Project For a New American Century had their agenda prepared and published before they propped up an uninformed, inexperienced, failed businessman named George W. Bush as their poster candidate.

He had great appeal among the good ole boys and the bible thumpers who were not very likely to vote for the scowling man behind the curtain, Dick Cheney.

George W. Bush had not been sitting around for the previous 10 years thinking about foreign policy. Rather, he was being coached on foreign policy by handlers who had to teach him that Africa was a continent and not a country.

The stated aims of PNAC can be followed from their war plans to their hopes of global military superiority. George W. Bush was not a factor when PNAC was writing its openly published policies. But once the 2000 election was secured, PNAC members became and remain the mainstay of the Bush administration, holding virtually every major position relating to foreign policy.

If you read the accounts of GW Bush White House insiders:Paul O’Neil (Treasury Secretary), Richard A. Clark (Anti- terrorism Czar), and Col. lawrence Wilkerson (Colin Powell’s Chief of Staff) and consider The downing strett memo, you can see a seemless explaination of how and why we were lied into the Iraq fiasco.

OF COURSE IF YOU BELIEVE ALL THAT YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE A CRACKPOT CONSPIRACY THEORIST AND EVERYONE KNOWS THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSPIRACY- RIGHT?